Recent News

Chek News
December 7, 2025
By: Brenna Owen

Original article here.

British Columbia’s logging agency has changed a policy that conserved remnant old-growth forest in the province’s northwest, with a government briefing note showing a plan to open those areas for harvesting has been approved.

The note, obtained by The Canadian Press and written by a BC Timber Sales manager in the Babine region, acknowledged the shift “may invoke scrutiny” from conservationist environmental groups.

It says First Nations in the Bulkley, Morice and Lakes timber supply areas do not support old-growth logging deferrals recommended by a provincially appointed panel in 2021, and continuing to conserve remnant stands “does not demonstrate respect of the First Nations’ responses” to that process.

Photographs of the document show the word “approved” marked with a yellow highlighter, just below the recommendation to stop sparing the remnant old-growth.

The photos show the document was dated July 9 and signed by Jevan Hanchard, regional executive director for the Forests Ministry in the Skeena region, on Aug. 9. It was also reviewed by BC Timber Sales’ director of sustainability, among others.

In response to a request for comment on the briefing note, the Forests Ministry says the province is “committed to true and lasting reconciliation with First Nations.”

In the case of the Babine region, it says the ministry is following First Nations’ definitions of areas to be deferred from logging.

The pre-existing BC Timber Sales policy was to preserve remnant old-growth, regardless of First Nations’ positions on the recommended deferral areas.

Independent ecologist Rachel Holt served on the panel that identified 2.6 million hectares of old-growth at risk of irreversible biodiversity loss in 2021, and proposed it be set aside from logging to allow time for long-term planning with First Nations.

She says the remnant subcategory represents the last of the old-growth in a given area, providing habitat for wildlife that isn’t found in younger forests.

“Across the landscape of B.C., we are systematically losing that forest type … and many, many species are suffering as a result.”

Holt says the briefing note demonstrates a lack of understanding within BC Timber Sales about “the importance of … these irrecoverable ecological values.”

But the crisis in B.C.’s forests is not just ecological.

Holt says extremely poor management has led to mill closures and job losses across the province, with forestry companies citing market conditions and a lack of fibre among the driving factors.

B.C. is meanwhile trying to position itself as a leader in clean, green jobs, she says.

“Logging ancient forests is not a clean job from a carbon perspective or a biodiversity perspective or a global responsibility perspective.”

The Forests Ministry says in general, when First Nations have indicated they do not support deferrals — and in the absence of other government-to-government forestry agreements — BC Timber Sales will continue to defer remnant old-growth where “at-risk ecological criteria have been confirmed.”

“Our approach is focused on the full value of ecosystems — including the protection of watersheds, wildlife habitat and areas of cultural significance,” the ministry says.

Bulkley Valley resident Len Vanderstar, a professional forester by training and a former habitat biologist for the B.C. government, says the deferral mapping was meant to preserve ecologically important old-growth forests.

Instead, it “painted bull’s-eyes on the best, last wood that was left,” he says.

“They’re targeted with industry impunity, with government endorsement,” says Vanderstar, who left his job with the province in 2018.

He says the forests where he lives along the Highway 16 corridor have been hammered by clear-cut logging, leaving very little old-growth.

Vanderstar says logging the last old-growth depletes ecological capital, or the important services natural systems provide, and undermines community resiliency at a time when B.C. is trying to bolster against U.S. tariffs and economic threats.

“What we’re doing is we’re depleting our future generations, maybe even ourselves and our communities, and that’s why we’re seeing these mill closures.”

Holt notes a previous BC Timber Sales guidance document from 2023outlined how big-treed and ancient old-growth, subcategories representing the oldest and biggest trees left standing across B.C., would be open for logging where First Nations didn’t support or stayed silent on the proposed deferral areas.

At the same time, Holt says B.C. has not provided sufficient conservation financing or any real alternatives for First Nations to offset foregone logging revenues.

The BC Timber Sales briefing note from July says the agency’s policies related to the proposed deferral areas were to be “stopgap” measures.

The approach to managing old-growth in northwestern B.C. has progressed over the last four years, “but the (BC Timber Sales) policy has remained static,” it says.

“First Nations and stakeholders have strongly voiced that old-growth should not be managed through static reserves, but rather a natural range of variability be represented on the landscape through active management,” it says.

The agency has harvested some portions of proposed deferral areas with “moderate to severely burned timber” in the Babine region using a specified field verification process, while avoiding remnant stands, the note says.

As a result, it says many timber sales licenses had required re-engineering, posing a “significant hindrance and economic impact” to the agency’s operations.

The pre-existing policy was to preserve remnant old-growth even when field verification found “it does not meet old-growth stand conditions,” the note says.

Holt says the deferral process has been marred by a lack of transparency.

She says she has asked BC Timber Sales to see the data behind the decision that a forest doesn’t meet the criteria, but it has never been provided.

“In all of these cases, a professional forester is going ahead and writing these prescriptions,” she says, noting logging rare and irreplaceable remnant old-growth works against the spirit and intent of the profession’s ethical guidelines.

Foresters are supposed to think generations ahead and make good stewardship decisions, she said.

“These are not good stewardship decisions,” she says.

A recent review of BC Timber Sales, convened by the province, says the agency “can and should play a critical role in shaping a new model for forest stewardship.”

Holt says the policy change for remnant stands flies in the face of that statement.

There is no sign of the change on a B.C. government web page with policy updates related to BC Timber Sales. There is no information currently listed under “important notices” for the Babine region, while the most recent document listed under “policy changes” for the whole province was posted in September 2022.

The BC Timber Sales briefing note outlining the policy change for remnant old-growth does not specify which First Nations it is referring to when it says those in the Bulkley, Morice and Lakes timber supply areas do not support the deferral process.

The Canadian Press sent requests for comment to several nations, including the Lake Babine Nation, Saik’uz First Nation, Wet’suwet’en First Nation and Cheslatta Carrier Nation, among others, but received no responses in time for publication.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 7, 2025.

November 19, 2025
By Stefan Labbé

See original article here.

A leaked technical review prepared for a group of First Nations claims British Columbia is greatly overestimating how much timber it can sustainably harvest in a push for short-term economic gains.

The previously unreleased report charges that the methods the province uses to calculate how many trees are on the landscape—and therefore how much can be logged—is fundamentally flawed and based on “wildly extreme assumptions” that hurt the long-term health of B.C.’s forests.

The report’s authors, a forest ecologist and a registered professional forester, only agreed to speak with BIV after it independently obtained a 572-page draft of the report originally dated September 2024.

“There’s a strong likelihood that throughout the province we’re cutting almost at twice the rate of what is considered sustainable,” said co-author Dave Radies. “We’re running out of wood.”

The report focuses on the Mackenzie timber supply area (TSA), a 6.41-million-hectare swath of land spanning the Rocky Mountains and the Peace River region.

In their analysis, the authors challenge the methods B.C. uses to determine the annual allowable cut (AAC)—how much timber can be cut in the region in a given year—concluding their numbers are likely double what can be harvested without causing significant long-term damage.

The findings could have province-wide implications, as experts say the same modelling framework used in Mackenzie is applied across all TSAs in B.C.​

Peter Wood, a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Faculty of Forestry who recently reviewed the document, said the report raises a number of “very concerning” questions around how the province calculates annual allowable cut.

“There’s nothing more important than AAC determination in terms of how forestry is going to affect a landscape in B.C.—all subsequent decisions end up being constrained by this number,” said Wood.

Without oversight, what comes out of the Ministry of Forest’s “black box of calculations” has been difficult to prove or disprove, he said. Wood added the unreleased report offers a glimpse of those “inner workings.”

“It’s pretty incredible they were able to do that,” Wood said. “My first gut feeling when I read it was ‘This is how ghost towns are made.’”

Unrealistic assumptions threaten wildlife, Indigenous rights

Under the Forest Act, every 10 years the chief forester must carry out a review of what can be annually logged across all of B.C.’s 37 timber supply areas and 34 tree farm licences.

The Mackenzie region’s latest review came in May 2023, when B.C.’s chief forester Shane Berg officially determined 2.39 million cubic metres of timber could be removed from its forests each year. The calculation used a starting “base case” of 2.97 million cubic metres.

But when Radies and his co-author, registered professional forester Martin Watts, ran their own statistical analysis, they found the province’s base case could only be justified through extreme, unrealistic assumptions that ignore reality.

Even using the ministry’s own extremely conservative methodologies, harvesting more than 1.06 million cubic metres a year was found to put environmental values—including the health of caribou, grizzly bears, fish and other furbearing animals—at high risk.

Their conclusion: the annual cut approved by the province would negatively impact First Nations’ constitutionally protected rights to hunt, gather and fish.

B.C. forest model found to use manipulated inputs

Radies said the core of the problem is that the Minister of Forests can legally direct the chief forester to manipulate up to 49 inputs used to model how much timber is actually on the land base. That allows the minister to warp data and prioritize economic interests over what’s truly sustainable, he said.

“The fact is, the minister puts restrictions on the inputs to the model to serve an economic interest. That’s what creates a lack of transparency,” Radies said. “We’re not being honest with ourselves.”

Watts, who runs the Victoria-based firm FORCOMP Forestry Consulting Ltd. and carried out much of the report’s statistical analyses, said that when he ran his own models, he found the government relies on unverified forest growth estimates and operational assumptions that do not reflect current practices. That, he said, is leading to a massive overestimation of available wood.

The provincial calculations were found to assume that future tree plantations will not fail and that there will be no drought. Government models also assume minimal damage from insects and disease, despite the region losing 37 per cent of its forests to the mountain pine beetle epidemic in recent years, according to the report.

“They’ve got unrealistic projections of how that’s going to magically grow back in the future,” said Watts.

When the chief forester made the 2023 determination, the model assumed about 310 hectares of harvestable forests would burn and be lost every year.

But in the decade leading up to 2022, the annual loss of forests to fire averaged about 1,800 hectares per year. Even more dramatically, in 2023—the same year the calculation was made—record wildfires burned at least 50,000 hectares of harvestable timber in Mackenzie. Those losses are 160 times higher than what the province assumes will occur for the coming decades.

A study published that same year in the journal Nature found rising temperatures due to climate change have dried out B.C.’s forests, leading to a historic spike in wildfire activity over the past two decades.

The research is among multiple peer-reviewed investigations that indicate the province will become a global hot spot for increasingly powerful mega-fires.

Another study published in 2024 found exposure to increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is accelerating the reproductive cycle of mountain pine beetles. The authors concluded that the pests are adapting to human-caused climate change and that B.C. should expect more outbreaks over the coming decades.

Radies said the gap between what the Ministry of Forests is modelling and what independent science is telling us about the impacts of climate change on forests is startling.

“It’s totally insane,” he said.

Collaboration ends abruptly

The report was produced as part of a three-year pilot project involving five First Nations: Tsay Keh Dene Nation, Takla Nation, Kwadacha Nation, Nak’azdli First Nation, and the McLeod Lake Indian Band (members of the Gitxsan Nation were involved to a lesser extent).

The project was meant to serve as a new way to implement B.C.’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, and allow the nations to work closely with the Ministry of Forests to re-assess Mackenzie’s timber supply.

For three years, the First Nations working group gained unprecedented access to the government’s data and methods. The result, according to Radies, was the “most comprehensive independent review of a B.C. timber supply process ever conducted.”

The authors say their work was later validated: after reviewing the report’s methodology, the Ministry of Forests chief statistician acknowledged that the ministry’s own calculation was not appropriate and supported the statistical approach taken by Watts.

Despite the internal support, Radies said the ministry refused requests from the working group to look deeper into provincial modelling and sensitivity analyses.

When their independent conclusions began to challenge the province’s official numbers, the collaboration abruptly ended, according to the authors.

“They just shut the door on us,” Radies said. “They stopped communicating with us all together.”​

Mike Morris, a former MLA who represented the Prince George-Mackenzie riding until 2024, said he was surprised that the science could be buried for more than a year.

“I read through the whole thing, and I was shocked at what I saw,” Morris said. “It shows the fatal flaw that’s been used for decades now.”

The former MLA said the damning findings are particularly explosive because they emerged from a process intended to be a model of transparency and collaboration.

He said First Nations in the Mackenzie TSA have raised concerns to him that releasing the report would directly challenge the chief forester’s credibility. That, in turn, could destroy their future economic opportunities with the province.

“Everybody is afraid to touch it,” Morris said. “It’s not a balanced playing field, and there’s a lot of pressure put on these First Nations because most of them are broke. They’re looking at any kind of economic advantage that they can get.”

With the report buried, access to timber in Mackenzie began changing hands. In September 2024, the timber giant Canfor Corp. (TSX:CFP) sold its tenure in the region to the McLeod Lake Indian Band and the Tsay Keh Dene Nation in a $69-million deal that gave each annual access to more than 430,000 cubic metres of wood.

At the time, McLeod Lake Indian Band Chief Harley Chingee said the deal would create “lasting economic benefits” and foster a “sustainable future for our people.”

BIV contacted all of the First Nations involved. Only one responded.

In a statement, Tsay Keh Dene Chief Johnny Pierre said his nation did not fund, endorse or technically review the report but that its findings are not surprising. He raised concerns that the harvesting approved in 2023 has focused logging operations in the TSA’s already over-harvested southwest area.

“This pattern is deeply concerning,” he said.

The Ministry of Forests defended the chief forester’s 2023 annual allowable cut determination for the Mackenzie TSA. In an unattributed statement, the ministry said the annual cut was lowered 20 per cent to address Indigenous rights, the environment, resource sustainability, and the needs of local communities.

Concerns raised in the report on data and methods “should be considered” in light of hundreds of hours of “unprecedented engagement and collaboration with First Nations” — a process that marks a “major step toward shared decision-making,” it added.

The ministry did not contest the report’s findings. It said all of the working group’s proposals could not be fully explored due to “limited resources” and that the ministry needs to improve how it works with First Nations.

A history of ‘voodoo science’ and ‘greed’

The systematic flaws identified in the Mackenzie TSA report are, according to the authors and other experts, a long-simmering crisis born from decades of political and industry pressure.

B.C. began its timber supply review program in 1992. The goal was to replace outdated data with a scientifically sound, transparent method that would include non-timber values—such as wildlife, water and biodiversity—and assure the public that the province was managing its forests sustainably.

Several experts BIV spoke to said that process was quickly compromised. Since the 1990s, Radies said forest industry lobbyists have pressured chief foresters to approve harvest levels based on what licences allowed and mills needed, rather than the true sustainable capacity of the forest.

“This is just the classic story of greed,” Radies said. “They loaded it up so much that there was no room for error.”

Independent forest ecologist and former government advisor Rachel Holt said she and other experts have been warning the province for decades over its plan to transition its forests into an agricultural model dominated by tree plantations.

The main risk has always been that second-growth replacement forests could not mature fast enough to keep up with government approvals to cut large swathes of primary forests, said Holt.

The gap in tree size has resulted in a massive reduction in available timber—a phenomenon anticipated as early as 1976 when a Royal Commission report warned the province’s depleted forest face the prospect of a great “fall down.”

“Yes—the timber supply crisis is not a crisis—it has literally been decades in the making,” said Holt.

When the mountain pine beetle epidemic hit in 1999, the whole forestry model saw its collapse accelerate even faster. The province reacted to the outbreak by boosting B.C.’s annual allowable cut to more than 85 million cubic metres by 2008.

Over the coming years, the amount of timber allowed to be cut in B.C. was sharply reduced, dropping to about 45 million cubic metres this year.

What actually gets cut every year is much lower, a consistent gap Radies said shows the province regularly approves more logging than the land can support.

“Most people define sustainability on fibre supply. I’m not even talking about environmental stuff,” he said. “I’m just talking about producing the same amount of two-by-fours because you’re still getting the same amount of trees out there.”

Nearly 50 sawmills have closed in B.C. over the past two decades. And since 2020, another half-dozen major pulp and paper mills have curtailed operations, indefinitely closed, or shut permanently in places like Powell River, Prince George and Crofton.

Paper Excellence permanently closed the Mackenzie pulp and paper mill in 2021. And in B.C.’s latest mill closure, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (TSX:WFG) announced earlier this month it would permanently shutter and lay off 165 workers at its 100 Mile House operations.

The common denominator in both closures: mills could no longer access economically viable timber.

Some experts and former officials who spoke to BIV agree the report raises questions over the root cause of those closures.

One expert with the Ministry of Forests who spoke on condition of anonymity said the way timber supply reviews are conducted in B.C. amounts to “voodoo science” and grossly overestimates harvestable wood.

“It’s a dirty secret. But if you lower that number, it’s seen as some kind of loss,” said the government expert. “We just don’t want to look ourselves in the face.”

According to Wood, the flawed assumptions and glaring omissions raised in the report show how B.C.’s complex forestry policy hides the truth from the public.

“At the very minimum, the onus now is for the ministry to respond to legitimate concerns that the cut has been set too high,” he said.

For Morris, the report shows that what is happening in Mackenzie can be applied to timber supply areas across the province, from 100 Mile House to Prince George, the Okanagan and Vancouver Island.

“When you lump everything together that’s taken place over the last number of decades now, they are merely exposing what’s been taking place, only in a scientific way,” Morris said.

“I really do believe that we need to hold a public inquiry into forestry and get to the bottom of it.”